Your comparison of what happens in a complicated region of the world that has been 
beset by ethnic strife for centuries with what might happen in this country at the 
hands of terrorists would be laughable if not for the fact that you appear to be 
deadly serious (no pun intended). But it is rather sad to see you have such an 
ignorant recall of historical events. Do you really think that the death squads 
operating in Guatemala, Nicaragua, and El Salvador that slaughtered hundreds of 
thousands of civilians in the 1980s weren't engaged in acts of terrorism? And do you 
think that because the U.S. and the Reagan administration only aided and abetted those 
groups, rather than actually directing them, they weren't complicit in the terrorism? 
How about Operation Phoenix during the Vietnam War, where the CIA led an operation 
that resulted in the deaths of somewhere between 50,000 (CIA claim) and 100,000 (media 
sources) North Vietnamese civilians? What, if it's state-sponsored, it's not terrorism?

What does this have to do with St. Paul? Probably nothing. But if you're going to 
stray way off topic, at least use some credible information. And in case you missed 
it, the killings at the Munich Olympics in 1972 were carried out by the Black 
September extremist group seeking a Palestinian state. Do you really believe that the 
only people who have ever committed terroristic acts in the Israeli-Arab conflict the 
past fifty or so years were Muslims? Try Jews, Christians, and a few other 
denominations as well. Menachem Begin, the one time prime minister of Israel, was part 
of a terrorist Israeli network that attacked the British occupation of Israel, blew up 
a hotel, engaged in sniper attacks, etc. Somehow we have tolerated those acts through 
the lens of history as being the work of freedom fighters, but any other such heinous 
attack is only carried out by mongrel dog jihadists. 

The reality is that all terrorism is appalling. As is the proposed solution that you 
advocate: militarizing the country. We can seal our borders, and it won't do anything 
to end poverty, create jobs (other than with Homeland Security, of course), provide 
affordable health care, develop sustainable energy sources, protect the environment, 
etc. Republicans, except for those who allied themselves with the John Birch society, 
used to understand this. A pity that your misplaced fear over something that 
hypothetically might occur in St. Paul skews you opinions so dramatically. You're just 
as likely to get injured or killed in a traffic accident when you're on the job as a 
police officer as be the victim of some terrorist lying in the midst somewhere in the 
metro area. 

Did it ever occur to you that the arrests of suspected "terrorists" is about racism 
and fear, and not based on credible evidence? I realize that your background in law 
enforcement might lead you to believe that only good arrests are being made in these 
cases, but remember when we rounded up all the Japanese Americans during World War II? 
What, exactly, is the difference between that and how the U.S. is treating any foreign 
national in this country right now?  

Tom Goldstein
Mac-Groveland
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to