Bob, what caucuses are you talking about?  With the exception of this last one (an 
even year with a hot presidential race), everyone attending their DFL caucuses in 
recent years has been eligible to attend their Ward Convention or Senate District 
Convention (as either a delegate or alternate).  At the Ward 3 convention in every 
year that I can remember, UNCOMMITTED is the most frequently named candidate (since 
subcaucuses to select City Convention delegates must name a candidate or state the 
they are uncommitted).  Once at the City Convention, there are usually multiple rounds 
of voting on endorsing a candidate.  Support moves around a great deal during this 
period.

At the last City Convention, after a couple rounds of voting, we were graced with 
three candidates seeking the endorsement - Jay Benanav, Randy Kelly, and Bob Long.  In 
the primary, the order of finish was Jay Benanav, Randy Kelly, and Bob Long.  There 
was a Republican candidate too.  He finished fourth.

I'm sorry your resolution didn't pass, but I'm not surprised, since it is akin to 
saying "we're engaged and I want you to be faithful, but I'm still going to play the 
field."


Mike Lewis
Mac-Groveland
Ward 3 DFL Chair

Maybe in the upcoming debate, President Bush will explain how he made surpluses as far 
as the eye can see into record deficits and a budget that will not be in balance until 
2040.  Or maybe explain why he opposed the Department of Homeland Security before he 
supported it.  Or maybe explain how he opposed the 9-11 Commission, before he sort of 
supported it.  Or maybe explain how it took him SEVEN MINUTES to get off his butt when 
America was under attack ......   OOPS, sorry, all out time.


--------------------------

Bob T. writes:


I have lived in Saint Paul since 1985, and I went to a couple of caucusses
in off years.  What I found at those caucusses was that they were already
packed with supporters of one candidate or another.  There were almost NO
undecideds.   As a result, the caucus was no place to discuss who should
be endorsed.  It was just a place for insiders to come and show their
strength.    The strongest factions were the people in public employee
unions who show up because they get to choose their bosses that way.

I made a proposal at my caucus that was soundly defeated.  I proposed a
resolution that we should not ask any candidate to make 'The Pledge' to
support the endorsed candidate, that we should encourage all candidates to
seek the endorsement, but that anyone who felt they might win a primary
should go ahead and run.

The DFL practice of demanding The Pledge means that the stongest
candidates often don't seek the endorsement.    The DFL picks a loser and
the people reject him/her.

Because of this Insider loaded process, I have never voted for a candidate
that made "The Pledge", and I doubt if I ever will.  If a candidate 
is
afraid to stand in a primary against other qualified candidates, and seek
the support of the people, then s/he won't get my vote.





Erik Hare said:
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Eric Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Any DFLer who thinks about running for Mayor, has to
>> be aware of the above and come up with a strategy to
>> counter that- AND explain their vision for the city.
>> That won't happen in an endorsement battle or money
>> wasting primary.
>
> I just want to second the statement that the DFLer has to have more than
> the endorsement, they have to have his/her message together and make it
> clear what they intend to do different.  That the last 3 mayoral races
> went to the non-DFL endorsed candidate in a city that otherwise votes
> overwhelmingly DFL shows you that something has been terribly wrong.
>
> As for wasting energy in a primary fight, I will agree that it's not
> likely to help someone get the needed message out, but a good politician
> can use the exposure to do exactly what needs to be done to defeat Kelly.
>



________________________________________________________________
Get your name as your email address.
Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to