Anne Carroll makes a good point when she says that
deciding whether to vote for an incumbent on the basis
of a single incident (about which we may not have all
the facts) is unfair. The problem with these judge
elections, though, is that usually there is almost no
information on which to base a decision. Attorneys who
appear before them are understandably reluctant to
voice their opinions since they will likely have to
appear before them in the future. So, how are we to
make an informed choice in a judgeship election?

This is why I believe we ought to change the
constitution and move to an appointed judiciary.
Legislators can develop a record on which to base a
decision as to whether someone is not only qualified
to be a judge but has a judicial temperment. Voters
can't do that.

Charlie Swope
Ward 1

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to