Ahh, yes, the same old tiresome arguments raise their ugly heads again.
Dennis never wavering in his defense of the insider baseball that has lost
more elections for the DFL in the last 20 years than it has won and little
more than heavy disappointment over the performance of those who did.

Shall we utter the litany of losers elected and non-elected that the
exclusive club has endorsed - state, city and elsewhere?

Nahhh. Let's not - unless it's absolutely necessary to make the point that
criticism from inside the party about its archaic processes, its
exclusionary club-like atmosphere, its willingness to decapitate its own
strongest members if they dare encroach on preconceived commitments to the
right of succession to office - elected and party.

Never, but never, critique the party and air its dirty laundry in public if
you ever wish to curry support from the mob inside. The only way to beat
them is to pack the caucuses or join another party...or often just by
running against the endorsed candidate. You'll be quickly embraced if you
win, quickly excommunicated if you don't.

Still the illusory view of DFL power in St. Paul. More often than not,
however, it's not a DFLer vs. a Republican - it's two DFLers going
head-to-head. Not pretty, but the maverick usually wins in that case. Norm
and Randy are but the latest examples. Even I came close.

So now will come the usual suspects lining up to be the next mayor, running
against pseudo-DFLer Kelly and splitting the party 10 ways with many of the
candidates claiming they're "next in line." Kelly wins in that case.

But the insiders will extract promises not to take their case to a primary
by coercion - warning that political careers are on the line if you dare
suggest the people and not a convention should choose the party's
representative in the General Election. They warnings will include empty
promises of support if you commit to dropping out if your opposition is the
endorsee - and the support always goes elsewhere anyway.

Someone will challenge the endorsee - they always do these days - and the
party, never wanting to reform itself to present voters with more than one
preferred candidate, will probably suffer another loss. Any wonder why Corky
Finney said, "uh-uh" to this? The only wrong statement he made was the one
where he said the city has lately become too politically polarized - the
operative word being lately?

In my 60 years of politics in St. Paul, I've rarely seen it otherwise, but
those were the days when Republicans share citizenship with DFLers. Not all
the battles are internecine and unity all but impossible. It will be a real
trip to see who emerges as the standard-bearers in the coming year. I hope
it will be someone who can beat Randy Kelly.

Lord knows we deserve it.

Andy Driscoll
Crocus Hill/Ward 2
------


> From: "Mike Fratto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [StPaul] Mayoral candidates
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Ah Dennis, I have spent many an hour for many years doing the caucus
> thing to find out it was the insider who got his/her way.  I have
> served on rules committees where insiders worked to get proposed
> rules that they didn't like defeated.  I worked on platform
> committees where committee chairs decided which ones to push
> through.
> 
> You are right, if you show up you can have input.  But, its my
> experience that you have to show up year after year after year to
> get to a point where your input is accepted.
> 
> Mike Fratto
> Payne Phalen

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_____________________________________________

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to