This is interesting.  As someone who knows a bit about the theatre
business in downtown St. Paul, I spent quite a bit of time at the
Galtier Theater.  I worked in all of the DT theatres, except the
Lyceum and I wrote a business plan to bring a movie theatre to DT
St. Paul for one of my MBA classes.  A couple months after
submitting this paper, it was announced that the new Galtier Plaza
would have a multiplex theatre.  IMHO, the one major factor that
contributed to its doom was its lack of marketing.  
 
Yes there were significantly fewer residents in downtown then there
are now.  However, when I worked in the system, there were six
theaters within a three block area.  I don't know how many people
lived downtown who didn't live in flop houses or single room
occupancies.  I do know most of the downtown residents did not have
significant means.  Most of the people who watched movies in
downtown St. Paul came downtown.  They then went to Bridgemans, The
Blue Chip, The Showboat, Gallivans or one of the other bars or
restaurants.  The restaurants in the proposed location will offer
the same benefits to hoped for theater.
 
Of course this was before megaplexes and free parking.
 
Part of Galtier Theater's failure is due, in my opinion to a
complete lack of interest by theater and Galtier management to get
people to the theatre.  (In fact Galtier Plaza management did very
little to get people into the building itself.)  I think they had a
deal with Subway once.  But there was few if any ties to
Fitzgerald's, Amelia's or other DT entertainment spots.  
 
The only promotion/marketing was an ad in the Pioneer press and
maybe the Downtowner and Skyway News.  With the location of its
Marque you didn't even know what was playing until you reached the
third floor.  You had to know you wanted to see a movie and you had
to make the choice to come downtown, or stay downtown to do it. 
There were few if any chance that someone walking into Galtier Plaza
would notice the Marque and decide to go to a movie.
 
If the proposed theatre is actually developed there will be street
level Marque with attractions etc.  This would, as a minimum, get
the folks who drive or walk by on the way to and from work to think
about going to a movie. 
 
I can't wait.  But by the time something actually gets built and
operational, I may just have enough time on my hands to go to a
movie theatre anytime I want.
 
Mike Fratto
Payne Phalen

>>> "Bob Spaulding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/05/2005 1:16:27 PM
>>>

SURVEYS SAY: DOWNTOWN UNITED BEHIND A MOVIE THEATER!
4-Screen Landmark-style Cinema could spur nightlife, be a
comparatively 
easy victory


Submarine or no, I thought as long as we're discussing downtown 
attractions, I'd share what the people who live downtown and run
stores 
downtown want most: a movie theater.  Downtown *CRAVES* a movie 
theater.

Downtown's district council - the CapitolRiver Council - recently 
surveyed more than 250 downtown residents, and a movie theater was
the 
clear #1 request for a new store or amenity.  #2 was a grocery
store 
open evenings, which now seems as if it may happen on its own. 
(See 
http://www.capitolrivercouncil.org/content.asp?id=109).   The
Council 
also surveyed downtown retailers, and guess what?  A request for a

downtown movie theater was tied as one of the top two requests (See

http://www.capitolrivercouncil.org/content.asp?id=114).  Retailers
tend 
to have a pretty good idea what is best for them.  When you combine
the 
research, a movie theater was the clear consensus between 
constituencies.

So to finesse this a bit, and inject a little personal opinion, the

attraction I'd most readily spend public money to create is a
4-screen 
Landmark-type Cinema St. Paul, as part of the development in the
empty 
lots across from Marshall Field's or Union Depot, or on one of the
West 
Publishing riverfront parcels.  (Landmark Cinema is the owner of
the 
Lagoon, Uptown and Edina Theaters to our west).  I think it would
be 
helpful to attract light "arts" movies in particular.  Something at

this smaller scale wouldn't bleed us dry, is achievable, has
widespread 
support, and would clearly would help spark some new nightlife, and

complement the direction we've already established.  Spend any time

looking at Uptown Minneapolis to see its impact there.  The market
for 
movie screens is wide open in St. Paul.  Minneapolis has only a 25%

larger population, yet about 400% more movie screens.

Now let me answer the inevitable corollary.  Six years ago, in a 
downtown with thousands less residents, Galtier Cinema closed.  I 
believe it closed because it was in an inaccessible location on the

third story of a largely empty and failed shopping center, which
was 
owned by people who want to privatize most of the space, and have
since 
done just that.  The common wisdom is that Galtier Plaza and Cinema

failed before it ever opened.  The Galtier Cinema was more
mainstream, 
and at times the selections seemed out of touch with its natural 
downtown constituency.  The slightly more "arty" Landmark Cinema
would 
complement the direction I think downtown wants to go, and would be

geographically more centrally located.   It would be the anchor of
a 
more easterly hub of nightlife (besides Grand Avenue).  Meanwhile,
I 
think a more mainstream St. Paul cinema can and should anchor the 
renewed Midway neighborhood, perhaps in the Cleveland Circle area,
or 
perhaps (later on) on the West Side Flats.

Downtown residents and retailers have established some priorities
for 
investment in attractions.  The one that rises to the top in the 
opinion research is a movie theater.  Perhaps in the next couple
years, 
there is a way we can push a workable movie theater concept
forward.  
And personally, I believe there's a way to do it without it being
too 
big, or tying it to a megaproject.  Bottom line: a Landmark movie 
theater is a way to score an easier win with downtown residents, 
businesspeople and the larger community, is comparatively
achievable 
for a smaller city investment, and would do much to complement and

spark new and existing nightlife downtown.  It would put downtown 
nightlife back on the metro area's cultural map.


Respectfully,

Bob Spaulding
Downtown Resident

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [email protected]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [email protected]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to