> --- Dan Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It now appears that Mayor Kelly had knowledge that
> > Sia Lo may have been acting improprerly, but did
> > nothing until the story became public. The
> question
> > now becomes, why did Mayor Kelly act only after
> the
> > facts became public? Why didn't he act before?
-----------
Phil writes:
> And why did St. Paul State Senator Mee Moua "act
> only
> after the facts became public" on her business's
> fines?
>
> Phil Fuehrer
> Highwood Hills
Sorry Phil, try again, its not even close to being
analogous in the broadest definition.
Senator Moua issue are private actions, with private
money, and she took personal responsibility.
The other issue is about public employees acting in
their public role, using public tax dollars for
private gain. And, it appears that no one is taking
responsibility.
Only one is being investigated as a criminal act.
The other one(Moua) was being resolved before the
story even broke.
Eric Mitchell
Payne Phalen
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
_____________________________________________
To Join: St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [email protected]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
