-----Original message----- From: "richardsan san" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:28:25 -0700 To: [email protected] Subject: [Stratalist-ot] Re: What happens if Obama is elected?
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > From: "richardsan san" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <sounds like> > > > "abomination"...say the conservatives... > > > > Like you know any conservatives. > > guess you missed all my annoying bulletins about my relatives slamming obama I saw them. I just don't think they're representative of conservatives. > > > Besides, the election ain't over. > > not sure how that works for today's missives... > We're supposed to believe you're isightful when you miss the subject of this thread? > > > > > > Be that as it may, some of the more thoughtful pundits think it will be a > > thugocracy: > > > > <http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/jumping_ship.html> > > and > > < > > http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/obama_vs_free_speech.html > > > > > > > In a previously hijacked thread, the son of Robert L. Lawson incorrectly > > implied that conservatives are making Obama out to be a terrorist because of > > his association with Bill Ayers. No, it's his judgment for associating with > > an unrepentant domestic terrorist that is in question, as well as his close > > affiliation with ACORN and their less-than-honarable methods. > > > that's a lie. > over 5 well known news giants have done internal examinations and > found.....nothing...... that offers any evidence of a close relationship > between the 2 men. > No, it's not a lie, richardsan. And your weak refutation sounds a lot like "2500 scientists say that AGW is a reality." Obama and Ayers were much closer than you want others to believe. You may find their association acceptable and it may even comfort you in some way. But, a great number of Americans may find it disturbing. There is no good reason for one hoping to ascend to the highest office in the land to associate himself with Bill Ayers, unless ... what? > the republican choice for VP is explicitly saying that....'obama pals around > with known domestic terrorists.' Bless her heart for being so plain spoken. > [notice the plural, and a lack of offering of details as to its validity and > who else she is inferring]. At her worst, she makes much more sense than you. > > well, i believe that's cancelled out by cacacaccain's association with the > bushes... You're equating a sitting president with a avowed domestic terrorist. Do you have any idea how sick that is? Do you ever wonder why people turn around and walk away when you start talking politics? > and i don't see this: > not "putting country first", when he "talked" to his captors.[ i believe > that's called treason, especially during war time.] Now you're being just plain nuts, richardsan. > being vocalised by the obama/biden crew to discredit mccain/palin. > it has equal if not greater value, than "pallin' around with domestic > terrorists" They way you've reacted so viscerally to that charge makes me think there's something to it. Does Obama have something to hide or to be ashamed of? Maybe you should read the latest articles by Stanley Kurtz. He seems to be the only one doing actual journalism on the Obama-ACORN and Obama-Ayers issues. Francis Drouillard, PE Novato, CA 94945 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
