On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -----Original message----- > From: "richardsan san" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:28:25 -0700 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Stratalist-ot] Re: What happens if Obama is elected? > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: "richardsan san" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > <sounds like> > > > > "abomination"...say the conservatives... > > > > > > Like you know any conservatives. > > > > guess you missed all my annoying bulletins about my relatives slamming > obama > > I saw them. I just don't think they're representative of conservatives.
then it's you who misses the subject of this thread. and what is your criteria for conservative representation? knowing them, i say it's my relatives...you, without knowing them, say otherwise...baseless. > > > > > > > Besides, the election ain't over. > > > > not sure how that works for today's missives... > > > We're supposed to believe you're isightful when you miss the subject of > this thread? i'm not sure why some people become 'the decider' when they try and counter an opinion with a dismissive tone. there you go. > > > > > > > > > > > Be that as it may, some of the more thoughtful pundits think it will be > a > > > thugocracy: > > > > > > <http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/jumping_ship.html> > > > and > > > < > > > > http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/obama_vs_free_speech.html > > > > > > > > > > In a previously hijacked thread, the son of Robert L. Lawson > incorrectly > > > implied that conservatives are making Obama out to be a terrorist > because of > > > his association with Bill Ayers. No, it's his judgment for associating > with > > > an unrepentant domestic terrorist that is in question, as well as his > close > > > affiliation with ACORN and their less-than-honarable methods. > > > > > > that's a lie. > > over 5 well known news giants have done internal examinations and > > found.....nothing...... that offers any evidence of a close relationship > > between the 2 men. > > > > No, it's not a lie, richardsan. And your weak refutation sounds a lot like > "2500 scientists say that AGW is a reality." yes, francis, it is a lie...it's the lies perpetrated by the conservatives, when pushed into a corner by their own deceptions. > > > Obama and Ayers were much closer than you want others to believe. You may > find their association acceptable and it may even comfort you in some way. > But, a great number of Americans may find it disturbing. There is no good > reason for one hoping to ascend to the highest office in the land to > associate himself with Bill Ayers, unless ... what? well, what then?...what of it? give us direct unbiased data that says there, "is something to make of it"..instead of rattling like it has any value. > > > > the republican choice for VP is explicitly saying that....'obama pals > around > > with known domestic terrorists.' > > Bless her heart for being so plain spoken. > > > [notice the plural, and a lack of offering of details as to its validity > and > > who else she is inferring]. > > At her worst, she makes much more sense than you. > > > > > well, i believe that's cancelled out by cacacaccain's association with > the > > bushes... > > You're equating a sitting president with a avowed domestic terrorist. Do > you have any idea how sick that is? Do you ever wonder why people turn > around and walk away when you start talking politics? bushes...plural...an inclusive set....not a single unit. > > > > and i don't see this: > > not "putting country first", when he "talked" to his captors.[ i believe > > that's called treason, especially during war time.] > > Now you're being just plain nuts, richardsan. leave my plain nuts out of this, i haven't mentioned anything about your proclivities...mccain isn't walking the walk he promotes. > > > > being vocalised by the obama/biden crew to discredit mccain/palin. > > it has equal if not greater value, than "pallin' around with domestic > > terrorists" > > They way you've reacted so viscerally to that charge makes me think there's > something to it. Does Obama have something to hide or to be ashamed of? considering the thread, i think visceral is apropos. it IS an aspect of the GOP campaign strategy. why so shocked when similar thoughts are mirrored back onto the repubs? shocking... > > > Maybe you should read the latest articles by Stanley Kurtz. He seems to be > the only one doing actual journalism on the Obama-ACORN and Obama-Ayers > issues. is he another right wing tool? ...i've "heard of" the 5+ news organisations that said there was nothing... i guess that kind of media vetting just doesn't work for you. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
