On Nov 17, 2008, at 12:32 PM, richardsan san wrote: > > When they get to define ID, they get to knock it around any way > they want. > > and you still haven't answered my question about why YOU think ID > is intelligent...
I think it's a stupid question, that's why. You might have asked "what is ID?" A: My understanding is that ID presumes intelligent causes are needed to explain the complexity of living organisms. Then you might ask next "do you think ID has any merit?" A: Not necessarily. They haven't proven anything yet. But until Darwinists explain the origins of life -- which they have yet to do -- they have no business dictating the terms under which that discovery will be made. That was the main lesson to be drawn from the movie "Expelled." Having extraordinary contempt for religion and the religious, you might then ask "do you think ID proves the existence of God?" A: Not necessarily. Or, you could ask: "should Darwinism be taught in out schools?" Yes. "Should ID be taught in our schools?" Not necessarily. "Should ID be excluded from the classroom?" No. Inasmuch as there isn't a whole lot to it yet, they shouldn't dwell on it, either. Does that clear things up for you, richardsan? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
