On Nov 25, 2008, at 5:24 PM, richardsan wrote: > i don't have any mercy towards convicted murderers...playing a game > like this isn't funny. > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Michael Luscombe > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 25-Nov-08, at 7:45 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > > > Anyone can play: > > > > <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/25/nyregion/25conroy.html?_r=1> > -- > > I don't get it. I feel like I'm missing something. > > Do they have evidence that he murdered someone? > > it's a little early to convict, but his confession to police kinda > works for me...
Me too. > Whether he's racist or not is somewhat besides the point. It may make > it a hate crime and effect sentencing, but murder is murder. To say > the guy is a good athlete or good with his friends is completely > irrelevant. Bah. Hate crime. What a load of crap. Murder is heinous when it's part of a hunt. If proven guilty, twenty years to life falls short of justice in my book. I agree his friends and athleticism have no bearing on his guilt or innocence. Dog killers, perhaps, but not people killers: <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/sports/football/26vick.html?em> Should they let him play or make him stay? Maybe he should stay inside a little longer. Anyone that can strangle a dog is capable of killing a human. > Of course, the article doesn't outline whether there's any evidence > outside of the contested confession. > > i couldn't see anywhere in that article where the confession is > being contested... > > his pending harassment 'charge'... could be something, too. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
