not much to discuss, if you want to drag one story down the 'all are guilty' path. that argument is unimaginative and doesn't follow the course of the article ...and the question, still unanswered; remains..."why do republican women ignore the obvious misogyny of their leaders?" there, in quotes, as well...
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Brian Lawson <[email protected]> wrote: > Being inclusive is myopic while limiting complaints about politicians not > answering questions to just the politicians from one party is not? > you want the scope to include everyone, why? the article doesn't talk about "everyone"...just vitter. > myopia |mīˈōpēə|nounnearsightedness.• lack of imagination, foresight, or > intellectual insight : historians have been censured for their myopia in > treating modern science as a western phenomenon. > > *Sorry but there is no myopia here. ALL our politicians need to be held to > a higher standard and should be punished for failing to uphold their oath of > office.* > they are only us...in better jobs, better pay better perks...why should * they* be punished? we sent them there! sure if they break the law, they should be punished, but that's a whole nuther can of worms...and is not part of the article i posted. > * > * > -- > Brian Lawson > > On Aug 25, 2010, at 3:44 PM, richardsan wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Brian Lawson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Obviously but it should be. If you're going to bag on politicians for >> being felons, why limit it to just one political party? Or is it a case of >> don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up? >> > > that's very myopic...and again i remind that the article and the list > aren't part of a comparative dialog. nearly every time i try to listen to a > republican answer a question about the ills of the gop, they [nearly] always > divert attention elsewhere. no straight answers...never address the > question. > how about...staying to the subject and not dilute it. it's just that i find > it very odd, that women support vitter, apparently even after considering > his past; his criminal associates. the real question, is why do they > overlook his obvious misogyny? > > telling david vitter or any other two faced individual to be more like > jesus doesn't work for people like that...there's the reply to comparative > dialog....... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<stratalist-ot%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > -- "doubts are the only certainties i have left." m. feldman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
