It's a myopic question dripping with partisan political presumptions. It's not even clever or humorous.
And, you could very easily answer it yourself by flipping the presumptions. For example, you could ask yourself why Democrat women supported John Edwards in 2004 or Bill Clinton in 1996. On Aug 25, 2010, at 8:44 PM, richardsan wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > Republicans aren't the only ones that campaign on values, nor are they only > ones the "spew." > > The mistake richardsan is making is that he is trying to paint an entire > group of people with Vitter's problems for political gain. It makes > richardsan look like the sucker that all politicians rely on to retain power. > > > oh, i see...by that assertion, you're going to include all the suckers that > voted for bush...twice...right? even those participating in this thread? > > and still, no one has bothered to offer an explanation as to why republican > women support misogynists like vitter and his aide? > uh, frank, i didn't write the above mentioned article...you know that right? > and i simply asked the question that followed... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
