On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]>wrote:
> Oh my, aren't you in a huff! > > You don't have to impugn the motives of women that may have voted for him > in the past. The only reason to do so is to make you feel better about > yourself (i wouldn't do that!). > > If you don't like Vitter, support another candidate. That's what Tea > Partiers are doing with relatively good success. > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 9:32 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On the go response > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's a myopic question dripping with partisan political presumptions. It's > not even clever or humorous. > > And, you could very easily answer it yourself by flipping the presumptions. > > > > nothing presumptious about vitters behaviour. > if u aren't gonna play keep walking. > > For example, you could ask yourself why Democrat women supported John > Edwards in 2004 or Bill Clinton in 1996. > > On Aug 25, 2010, at 8:44 PM, richardsan wrote: > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<stratalist-ot%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > -- "doubts are the only certainties i have left." m. feldman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
