On May 24, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Michael Luscombe wrote: > We'll all spend money we don't have on certain things. The difference is that > democrats would fund disaster relief, and republicans would fund illegal wars > against countries that pose no threat.\
That is a lie. A bald-faced lie. You think you're so intellectually superior, but you're a ideological hack. And a hypocrite. The Republicans would fund disaster relief. However, they would priortitorize it over other spending, something the douche-bager liberals like you can't manage to do. And your boy in the WH is engaged in a war in Libya, one of dubious benefit to the US. And one that is possibly illegal because is goes beyond that powers granted the president by the war powers act. > > If only you could find a way to help them by carpet bombing. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2011-05-24, at 10:50 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From the article you linked: >> >> “If there is support for a supplemental, it would be accompanied by support >> for having pay-fors to that supplemental,” Mr. Cantor, Virginia Republican, >> told reporters at the Capitol. The term “pay-fors” is used by lawmakers to >> signal cuts or tax increases used to pay for new spending. >> >> Responsible leaders like Cantor realize you have to prioritize, which is >> something douche-bagger Democrats are incapable of doing. >> >> On May 24, 2011, at 6:46 PM, richardsan wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> Funny, you don't seem troubled by your boy failing to declare Texas a >>> disaster area. >>> >>> Besides, Cantor didn't say don't help Mo. -- he said offset the costs of >>> helping Mo. by cutting other programs. It's the responsible thing to do. >>> wrong, he said: >>> first mistake, believing everything cantor says... >>> then: >>> "... that if Congress passes an emergency spending bill to help Missouri’s >>> tornado victims, the extra money will have to be cut from somewhere else" >>> >>> no, it's not...responsible. >>> ...how long do those "responsible" processes take to implement, while >>> people are languishing, francis? how long do they have to wait for 'the >>> cutting of other programmes' before they get assistance? >>> >>> typical anti-compassion antics of the right. >>> how about them letting go of some of their percs?...you know...for the >>> common good. how about reining in those wars, that are put on the fed >>> CC's...defence spending needs chopping too as well as those lucrative war >>> materials fundings, that seem to evaporate when the GDP is calculated... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On May 24, 2011, at 5:17 PM, richardsan wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/24/cantor-disaster-relief >>>> >>>> i mean....reallly......gooooo honey, leave! >>> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "StrataList-OT" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
