I don't like f*cking liars that repeat lies from far left websites to mischaracterize statements and actions from conservative politicians.
<http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110525/NEWS/305250087/House-GOP-advance-1B-disaster-aid-package> "The House Appropriations Committee approved the disaster aid cash along with two spending bills, one funding the Homeland Security Department and the other veterans programs." and "The disaster aid package would be financed by a $1.5 billion cut from a loan program to encourage the production of fuel-efficient cars. That means the new spending wouldn’t add to out-of-control deficits." And this wasn't a debate on whether or not to fund relief -- there was agreement on that issue. So get off your high horse, you frigging phony. > For Pete's sake, Francis. Is it really necessary to start and end every > argument with name-calling? > > It's starting to feel like I'm arguing with a foul-mouthed 6 year old, > possibly drunk, definitely angry. > > The illusion that this is any kind of "debate" is tenuous at best. > > I'd stay longer and refute the meager logic you offered, but I've ceased > believing that you want any displaced people helped, and all of your circular > arguments make perfect sense for someone without a soul. > > Michael > > > On 2011-05-25, at 1:07 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > > > On May 24, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Michael Luscombe wrote: > > > >> We'll all spend money we don't have on certain things. The difference is > >> that democrats would fund disaster relief, and republicans would fund > >> illegal wars against countries that pose no threat.\ > > > > That is a lie. A bald-faced lie. You think you're so intellectually > > superior, but you're a ideological hack. And a hypocrite. > > > > The Republicans would fund disaster relief. However, they would > > priortitorize it over other spending, something the douche-bager liberals > > like you can't manage to do. > > > > And your boy in the WH is engaged in a war in Libya, one of dubious benefit > > to the US. And one that is possibly illegal because is goes beyond that > > powers granted the president by the war powers act. > > > >> If only you could find a way to help them by carpet bombing. > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On 2011-05-24, at 10:50 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> From the article you linked: > >>> > >>> “If there is support for a supplemental, it would be accompanied by > >>> support for having pay-fors to that supplemental,” Mr. Cantor, Virginia > >>> Republican, told reporters at the Capitol. The term “pay-fors” is used by > >>> lawmakers to signal cuts or tax increases used to pay for new spending. > >>> > >>> Responsible leaders like Cantor realize you have to prioritize, which is > >>> something douche-bagger Democrats are incapable of doing. > >>> > >>> On May 24, 2011, at 6:46 PM, richardsan wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> Funny, you don't seem troubled by your boy failing to declare Texas a > >>>> disaster area. > >>>> > >>>> Besides, Cantor didn't say don't help Mo. -- he said offset the costs of > >>>> helping Mo. by cutting other programs. It's the responsible thing to do. > >>>> wrong, he said: > >>>> first mistake, believing everything cantor says... > >>>> then: > >>>> "... that if Congress passes an emergency spending bill to help > >>>> Missouri’s tornado victims, the extra money will have to be cut from > >>>> somewhere else" > >>>> > >>>> no, it's not...responsible. > >>>> ...how long do those "responsible" processes take to implement, while > >>>> people are languishing, francis? how long do they have to wait for 'the > >>>> cutting of other programmes' before they get assistance? > >>>> > >>>> typical anti-compassion antics of the right. > >>>> how about them letting go of some of their percs?...you know...for the > >>>> common good. how about reining in those wars, that are put on the fed > >>>> CC's...defence spending needs chopping too as well as those lucrative > >>>> war materials fundings, that seem to evaporate when the GDP is > >>>> calculated... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > > > Francis Drouillard, PE Novato, CA 94945 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
