For Pete's sake, Francis. Is it really necessary to start and end every argument with name-calling?
It's starting to feel like I'm arguing with a foul-mouthed 6 year old, possibly drunk, definitely angry. The illusion that this is any kind of "debate" is tenuous at best. I'd stay longer and refute the meager logic you offered, but I've ceased believing that you want any displaced people helped, and all of your circular arguments make perfect sense for someone without a soul. Michael On 2011-05-25, at 1:07 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > On May 24, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Michael Luscombe wrote: > >> We'll all spend money we don't have on certain things. The difference is >> that democrats would fund disaster relief, and republicans would fund >> illegal wars against countries that pose no threat.\ > > That is a lie. A bald-faced lie. You think you're so intellectually superior, > but you're a ideological hack. And a hypocrite. > > The Republicans would fund disaster relief. However, they would priortitorize > it over other spending, something the douche-bager liberals like you can't > manage to do. > > And your boy in the WH is engaged in a war in Libya, one of dubious benefit > to the US. And one that is possibly illegal because is goes beyond that > powers granted the president by the war powers act. > >> If only you could find a way to help them by carpet bombing. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2011-05-24, at 10:50 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From the article you linked: >>> >>> “If there is support for a supplemental, it would be accompanied by support >>> for having pay-fors to that supplemental,” Mr. Cantor, Virginia Republican, >>> told reporters at the Capitol. The term “pay-fors” is used by lawmakers to >>> signal cuts or tax increases used to pay for new spending. >>> >>> Responsible leaders like Cantor realize you have to prioritize, which is >>> something douche-bagger Democrats are incapable of doing. >>> >>> On May 24, 2011, at 6:46 PM, richardsan wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> Funny, you don't seem troubled by your boy failing to declare Texas a >>>> disaster area. >>>> >>>> Besides, Cantor didn't say don't help Mo. -- he said offset the costs of >>>> helping Mo. by cutting other programs. It's the responsible thing to do. >>>> wrong, he said: >>>> first mistake, believing everything cantor says... >>>> then: >>>> "... that if Congress passes an emergency spending bill to help Missouri’s >>>> tornado victims, the extra money will have to be cut from somewhere else" >>>> >>>> no, it's not...responsible. >>>> ...how long do those "responsible" processes take to implement, while >>>> people are languishing, francis? how long do they have to wait for 'the >>>> cutting of other programmes' before they get assistance? >>>> >>>> typical anti-compassion antics of the right. >>>> how about them letting go of some of their percs?...you know...for the >>>> common good. how about reining in those wars, that are put on the fed >>>> CC's...defence spending needs chopping too as well as those lucrative war >>>> materials fundings, that seem to evaporate when the GDP is calculated... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
