Another Castro blast from Bruce.

Are you really going to insist  that 1:5 Americans are in poverty? Really?


On Oct 5, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:

> 
> On Oct 5, 2011, at 9:05 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> mex my want to re-evaluate the assertion that 1 in 5 Americans live below 
>> the poverty level:
>> 
>> <http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/10/hunger-hoax-perpetuates-dependency?utm_source=10/5%20Washington%20Examiner%20Opinion%20-%2010/05/2011&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Washington%20Examiner:%20Opinion%20Digest>
> 
> "Burgers, pizzas and the like cost more than food that you can buy at a store 
> and cook yourself. If you can afford junk food, you can certainly afford 
> healthier food."
> 
> Wrong on most levels. When burgers cost $1, they are cheaper than the 
> equivalent food 
> 
> For someone like Sowell, yes, it's certainly true that healthy fresh food 
> costs more than junk food, but he clearly doesn't live in the 'food deserts' 
> that characterize a great deal of the landscape of poor America:
> 
> <http://www.cdc.gov/features/fooddeserts/>
> 
> (by your constant denigrations of the poor, I can pretty well assume you have 
> little direct experience. I've had to shop in the kinds of slum grocery 
> stores they're describing and yes, there's a significant difference in costs. 
> Just a tiny, petty example: in one (NY Food Lion store circa 1990, istr it 
> was in Tarrytown) I went looking for some canned tomato sauce. IN the stores 
> you or I shop in we have a choice, often three or more brands, and small, 
> medium and large cans, with significant quantity savings for the large cans.
> 
> In the slum store there were two sizes of cans: the 8 oz size you or I would 
> call 'small' and a ridiculously tiny 4 oz size. The prices were the same as 
> for a medium and small cans in the much nicer suburban store 15 miles up the 
> road.
> 
> The vegetables looked like they were the ones swept up off the floor in the 
> produce warehouse and were exorbitantly priced.
> 
> I've seen this pattern reproduced again and again. Even Wal-Mart does it this 
> way.
> 
> Also, he completely discounts the time it takes to do that cooking; these are 
> not his fantasy 'Father Knows Best' 1950's households; there is usually no 
> one with the time to do this cooking, let alone possessing the skills and in 
> many cases, even the most minimal of equipment.
> 
> And finally he's just as patronizing as any of the rest as he scolds these 
> people for not cooking more of their own food.
> 
> Finally, Francis (Wouldn't want expend TOO many milliCastros of my free 
> speech allowance on the subject!), don't link to opinion pieces by partisan 
> hacks with no links to actual data to support his theories and pass them off 
> as 'fact'. Doesn't work that way.
> 
> (And I won't EVEN getinto the hackery of "the poors, they have the TeeVee 
> sets and the Air conditioners so they're not poor!" Do your REALLY need to be 
> taught the trajectory of technology costs over the last fifty years!
> 
> (post length 35.4 mCastros)
> 
> -- 
> Bruce Johnson
> University of Arizona
> College of Pharmacy
> Information Technology Group
> 
> Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "StrataList-OT" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

Reply via email to