On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:05 AM, richardsan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Brian Lawson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That would be an unconstitutional abridgment of the 1st amendment.
>>
>
> "unconstitutional" that's what all those smokers, who smoked wherever they
> wanted to said, after laws were made to deny them their right to smoke.
You're wrong on this, Richardsan.
Smoking isn't speech, and second-hand smoke is a killer.
Denying the holocaust is speech, and denying the holocaust only hurts feelings,
not people.
-W
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
