On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:26 AM, TENEBRAE <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:05 AM, richardsan wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Brian Lawson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> That would be an unconstitutional abridgment of the 1st amendment. > >> > > > > "unconstitutional" that's what all those smokers, who smoked wherever > they > > wanted to said, after laws were made to deny them their right to smoke. > > You're wrong on this, Richardsan. > > Smoking isn't speech, and second-hand smoke is a killer. > i used it an example of where peoples' manifest thought perpetuated a "right" to do as they please and did it, until legislation stepped in...slavery, women's rights, could be other examples. > Denying the holocaust is speech, and denying the holocaust only hurts > feelings, not people. > -W > > > ...there are what, 18 countries in europe that have made this issue > important enough to make new laws banning it. they're wrong, as well? > -- knowledge and wisdom come from knowing a ""republican conservative"" is an oxymoron. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
