Hello Craig, Comments below.
Tuesday, January 22, 2002, 9:35:59 PM, you wrote: CRM> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: >> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:40:28 -0500 >> From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Validator/Tiles integration in Struts >> >> We went back and forth about this in regards to the Velocity/Struts >> integration package for a while. Finally, we put support for the >> ContextHelper in Struts 1.1 (which might also work with the JSTL) and >> the adapter for 1.0 in a new Velocity Tools package. The ContextHelper >> gave Gabriel and Geir what they needed to know to write the 1.0 adapter, >> and leaves most of the Velocity code with the Velocity team. >> >> Since Struts has so many Commons dependencies now, one more isn't going >> to make any difference :) >> CRM> And we're going to be dependent on the underlying Commons package anyway, CRM> in order to use the functionality :-). >> The next question might be what about Tiles integration in Struts? >> Cedric's Definitions are really quite neat, are coupled (to an extent) >> with the ActionForwards, and has hooks to the ActionServlet. It also >> uses an XML configuration file. Leaving it seperate seems fine, but then >> again, if we have everything else in struts-config ... >> CRM> Tiles is next on my list to look at. CRM> A meta-question, though ... would you guys be interested in capping the CRM> 1.1 release after we deal with validator/services/tiles? If we agreed for CRM> that, we oculd probably get a 1.1 release out in time for JavaOne 2002 CRM> (end of March this year). I think it is real time to end work. >> A very cool new feature, that I'm just getting into today, is the >> ability for each Tile to call an Action as it is included, which makes >> writing portlets very simple. As soon as get through it, I'm going to >> take a look at it from the perspective of the new sub-application >> (application module?) support. >> >> -Ted. >> CRM> Craig >> >> David Winterfeldt wrote: >> > >> > I've been thinking about the inclusion of the Struts >> > driver/interface to the Validator with the Commons >> > version. Some of my concerns are as follows. If >> > Struts is included, what is the criteria for including >> > another driver? I wouldn't want to be exclusive, but >> > I wouldn't want to get into having to maintain drivers >> > for frameworks I don't use or understand. One >> > solution I can think of would be if a Commons commiter >> > would volunteer to maintain that driver/interface and >> > I could help them. The only other issue is that if >> > the driver is in Commons then the example web apps and >> > cactus unit tests would be there too. It doesn't seem >> > like this should be there. Maybe that is just because >> > there aren't any other Commons projects doing this >> > yet, but there will be in the future. >> > >> > David >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> CRM> -- CRM> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CRM> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Best regards, Oleg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
