> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Struts-EL: Finished with copyright header and javadoc
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 10:56 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Struts-EL: Finished with copyright header and javadoc
> > 
> > In several tag classes in the HTML library, I have some 
> > attribute evaluations
> > commented out, as I've discovered that these are attributes 
> > which the HTML 4.01
> > spec defines, but which are not covered in the current Struts 
> > tag, either
> > because their TLD doesn't specify them, or the Struts tag 
> > doesn't properly emit
> > them.  I've noticed some of these have had bugs reported 
> > against them (some by
> > me), but probably not all.  One thing I want to do in the 
> > very near future is
> > make sure all of these are logged (and maybe even fix them :) ).
> 
> Is there an easy way to find these comments? A Bugzilla report listing
> what's missing would be very helpful. I've wanted to get this 
> cleaned up,
> but haven't had the time to go through and check all the tags myself.

If you want a head start, you can grep for "//.*evalAttr" in ".java" files
in the "contrib/struts-el" tree.

I was planning on rechecking each one that I found (checking the spec, the
tld, and the tag code), just to make sure, before I submitted bug reports
(for each tag), but it doesn't matter who does that.  If you have time now,
have at it.  Otherwise, that was going to be on my evening work task list,
after I write and submit the announcement tonight, assuming I'm granted time
by my social director :) .

> > Is there some point where it would be worthwhile for me to write an
> > "[ANNOUNCEMENT]" note in struts-user about Struts-EL, or 
> > should that wait until
> > we get to a Struts release (1.1-b3, or 1.1)?
> 
> Feel free to make an announcement whenever you are 
> comfortable doing so. It
> would be a good idea to mention the earliest nightly build in 
> which people
> should expect the tags to be available.

I submitted my last changes (so far) yesterday evening.  I assume then, that
indicating the nightly build of 9/30 would be correct?

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to