Joachim,
+1 from my side. I think this is especially true for all the small patches
provided to the documentation.
There's not really something to test there, and I'd appreciate some feedback
(positive or negative) too, even if it was something like "Sorry, there's
some errors" or "I can't accept your patch, it is unusable because..".
Nevertheless, I highly appreciate the work and time all committers and
contributors spent and will spend and look forward to the 1.1 Final.
Cheers,
Yann
> Craig,
>
> I read somewhere that you got involved in opensource development because
> you where tired of waiting for fixes never being done? I think that is
> the way Eddie, Taylor, Jason and others (including myself) are starting
> to feel. After all Struts1.1 has been taking quite a long time now.
>
> Although our patches are minor, there should be some way of responding
> to them without having to post entire "alternative nightly builds".
> These patches are, after all just small patches.
>
> I dont think there is an "attitude" here, just a genuine interest in
> STRUTS and its development process.
>
> Suggestion: If committers have to "take ownership" it might not be
> addressed by anyone. Could there be a process where a request Manager
> could delegate ownership (if not taken) and committers could choose to
> accept this or not?
>
> -- Joachim
>
__________________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Möchten Sie mit einem Gruß antworten? http://grusskarten.yahoo.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
