Isn't this part of a bigger problem that the whole open source community is wrestling with? How do the boys doing Linux do it or is that community better funded so the committers can spend full time on it?
One other issue regarding this issue and struts that I think is worth mentioning is that this is the window to ERP and that the issues we are all facing are so open ended and we are all pulling this project in different ways as well as so many other competing projects. Because of this there might be a need for 'sub' projects with committers who only review that code. Edgar Dollin Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >Are you ready to do my job for me (60 hours a week lately), including my >travel schedule (such as Tokyo last week for JavaOne Japan), so I can >work on Struts? Or, better yet, pay me enough so I can work on it full >time? If you're not, then I find your attitude pretty presumptuous. > >All of Struts was, and is, done by volunteers on their own time. We do >this because we enjoy it -- the fact that *you* find it useful as well is >icing on the cake. When people have time to analyze the patches and apply >them (and take ownership for any problems that the patch causes), they >will -- but not until. > >If you feel strongly about it, start posting alternative nightly builds >that contain your patches applied. Who knows, if it's clear you know what >you are doing, you might get yourself nominated to be a committer, and >then *you* can see what it is like first hand :-). > >Craig > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
