My knowledge is weak in this area, but is a :// sequence required to be escaped? If not, the the following situation could occur when looking for :// blindly - I'll use a search engine as an example:
ActionForward -> redirect to /search.do?query=:// In this case, blindly looking for :// would be bad. It would be better, in my humble opinion, to quote the URL specification directly and require <scheme>://<rest of url>. Again, disclaimer :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net] > Sent: 18 October 2002 17:10 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Going to other context and/or server in 1.1 > > > At the risk of entertaining the masses, I think I'll comment > that I like > that idea. I'll try to get a fix in by this evening. If > someone thinks > that is bad, speak now or forever hold your peas! > > David Graham wrote: > > > What if we looked for "://" instead of specific protocols? > > > > We could also add an attribute like contextRelative="false". > > > > David > > > -- > Eddie Bush > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 09/10/2002 > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 09/10/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
