RequestProcessing? Andrew Harris
On 30 May 2003 at 7:39, David Graham wrote: > >In the 1.x series, we could do something like declare a > >RequestProcessorInterface, have the existing concrete classes implement > >that, and then change the underlying code to use interface instead, and > >avoid any external API changes. > > I'm fine with changing this in 1.x but not with a name like > RequestProcessorInterface or IRequestProcessor. We need to think up a > better name but we can leave that discussion for post 1.2 or post > suggestions to the enhancement ticket. It would also be good to change > ExceptionHandler and the various config objects to interfaces as well but > that may need to wait for 2.0. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
