Re: composable RequestProcessor

Sat, 31 May 2003 02:48:10 -0700

That doesn't fit well with method parameter semantics because it's not a noun. You can't say, "I'm passing a RequestProcessing to myMethod".

David


From: "Andrew Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: composable RequestProcessor
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:37:59 +0100

RequestProcessing?

Andrew Harris

On 30 May 2003 at 7:39, David Graham wrote:

> >In the 1.x series, we could do something like declare a
> >RequestProcessorInterface, have the existing concrete classes implement
> >that, and then change the underlying code to use interface
instead, and
> >avoid any external API changes.
>
> I'm fine with changing this in 1.x but not with a name like
> RequestProcessorInterface or IRequestProcessor.  We need to
think up a
> better name but we can leave that discussion for post 1.2 or post
> suggestions to the enhancement ticket.  It would also be good to
change
> ExceptionHandler and the various config objects to interfaces as
well but
> that may need to wait for 2.0.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to