Vic, Just shut up. You've been whining on about this on general@, long after being told that it's the wrong place for that discussion. You've attacked Apache in general, the chairman specifically, and now Craig. All the while, you've been told that appropriate measures are being taken by the appropriate people, but still you whine on with your "guilty until proven innocent" attitude.
If you feel "dirty" to be using Struts now, you are perfectly free to use something else instead. In fact, you don't have to use any ASF software at all. But if you're going to run around spouting the way you have been, I see absolutely no reason that you should expect free publicity from the ASF, nor do I see why you would even desire that. It could only make you feel more dirty still. I fully support Craig's action in updating the Struts site today. -- Martin Cooper On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > This is what broke it: > http://theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=22337 > > It was aleged that code was takem from someplace that was not allowing > it and placing it into Apache code base! ASF seems to be saying "we took > the design and are re-implementing it. > > Whatever. > > Shame on you for ... aparently... supporting it. > I guess it's good for comercial vendors such as Sun, but it is bad for > Open Source. I think ASF and Sun are a bit to close. I guess another brick. > > .V > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > Quoting Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >>Was that called for Craig? > > > > > > Yep. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
