Martin Cooper wrote:
 You've attacked <SNIP>
 ... Craig.

Craig attacked me.

All the
while, you've been told that appropriate measures are being taken by the
appropriate people

I was not told that! Do you have a link? You can send a private mail if you'd like, not to fan the falmes.


, but still you whine on with your "guilty until proven
innocent" attitude.

On general list, I linked the interface where TSS post in esence proved that the code that showed up... was not ASF license. It's on general, do you want a link? That was proof as far as I am concrened.
Also the circstances of all this code showing up and the timing of it made it very suspicions to me.



If you feel "dirty" to be using Struts now, you are perfectly free to use something else instead.

I have invested some 4 years into Struts.


I
see absolutely no reason that you should expect free publicity

You mean the fact that I was hosting a few popular Jakrata newsgroups, commons, tags, and Struts and *paying for the bandwith*, not charging anyone to the benefit of Struts community? Free publicity? In the same way UNC hosts Maven and provides bandith?
This was way long before there were alternatives (Gmane). Some people did not want to sign up to the mail list, they just wanted to browse the messages. Now, there is an alternative for newsgroups, so the fact that baseBeans supported it for year, counts for nothing. Real nice.


And this is for supporting OSS!
I would would companies hire Apache comitters if there is a precident of ASF taking code and refactoring it and "owning" it. I think it should be crystal clear the ethic in here.



I fully support Craig's action in updating the Struts site today.

You might also state which way you support the code alegations and what should be done about it.


.V







---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to