Re: Proposed Solution to Non-Serializable MessageResources Class

[Craig R. McClanahan]

Michael Westbay wrote:

> Vaala-san wrote:
>
> > I would like to further propose on this idea - create a
> > MessageResourcesInterface that various implementations can be created for.  Four
> > standard implementations could ship with struts: XML, Properties, and database.
> > I could see that some people may find it easier, or more practical to store
> > their messages in a database.
>
> This is the best idea I've heard so far.  And I believe I read that the
> factory pattern was one of McClanahan-san's favorites?
>

Yep :-).  Its a good idea.

Craig


>
> --
> Michael Westbay
> Work: Beacon-IT http://www.beacon-it.co.jp/
> Home:           http://www.seaple.icc.ne.jp/~westbay
> Commentary:     http://www.japanesebaseball.com/