----- Original Message ----- From: "Malcolm Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:19 PM Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
> I think I was better off not sending that last email, > especially on a Friday. :) > Thanks for education. > > - Malcolm > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:09 PM > >> To: Struts Users Mailing List > >> Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net > >> > >> > >> TGIF > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Cakalic, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:02 PM > >> Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net > >> > >> > >> > > >> > == Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:57 PM > >> > > To: 'Wes Bramhall '; ''Struts Users Mailing List' ' > >> > > Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ROTFLMAO! > >> > > > >> > > Mark > >> > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: Wes Bramhall > >> > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > >> > > Sent: 2/22/02 2:52 PM > >> > > Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net > >> > > > >> > > But it's Friday now, so SSS is allowed, right? > >> > > > >> > > (SSS = Small Scale Spamming) > >> > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:45 PM > >> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > >> > > Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I thought we had abandoned this thread in > >> favor of Struts related > >> > > questions > >> > > =) > >> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > From: "David Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:41 PM > >> > > Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I'm staying out of this discussion, but > >> to answer your question -- > >> > > > > >> > > > IMNSHO = In My Not So Humble Opinion > >> > > > > >> > > > --David > >> > > > > >> > > > On Friday 22 February 2002 01:03 pm, you wrote: > >> > > > > IMNSHO? What the hell is that? Man, > >> the colloquial shortcuts are > >> > > getting > >> > > > > hairy these days.... :) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > From: Edward Q. Bridges > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > > > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:15 AM > >> > > > > To: dIon Gillard; Struts Users Mailing List > >> > > > > Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > "location independence" means > >> independent of location, > >> > > that is all. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > if you're implementing two interfaces > >> to do (more or > >> > > less) the exact > >> > > same > >> > > > > thing, and one is called "local" and > >> one is called > >> > > "remote" that is > >> > > > > absolutely *not*, by any stretch of > >> the imagination, "location > >> > > > > independent". _end of story_. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > with EJBs the method call does not > >> "appear" to be remote, > >> > > because it > >> > > is > >> > > > > *explicitly* remote. the method is in > >> a "RemoteInterface" and > >> > > throws a > >> > > > > "RemoteException" for crying out loud! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > furthermore, it's not about box1 vs > >> box12. to be more > >> > > precise, it's > >> > > about > >> > > > > vm1 vs. vm12. and, if you are writing > >> a client, your client has > >> > > business > >> > > > > logic to take care of. it's the > >> servers responsibility > >> > > to determine > >> > > > > whether it should call a method at vm1 > >> or at vm12. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > IMNSHO, this is the achilles heel of EJB. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > --e-- > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 05:24:22 +1100, > >> dIon Gillard wrote: > >> > > > > >The method call can take place > >> anywhere, but always appears to be > >> > > > > >remote. That could be many remote > >> machines though. Location > >> > > independence > >> > > > > >is not about local vs remote, it's > >> more about box1 vs box12. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
