I believe we all knew that one, James ;) ... but thanks for your clearification none-the-less =)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Cakalic, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:02 PM Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net > == Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:57 PM > > To: 'Wes Bramhall '; ''Struts Users Mailing List' ' > > Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net > > > > > > ROTFLMAO! > > > > Mark > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wes Bramhall > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > > Sent: 2/22/02 2:52 PM > > Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net > > > > But it's Friday now, so SSS is allowed, right? > > > > (SSS = Small Scale Spamming) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:45 PM > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net > > > > > > I thought we had abandoned this thread in favor of Struts related > > questions > > =) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:41 PM > > Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net > > > > > > > I'm staying out of this discussion, but to answer your question -- > > > > > > IMNSHO = In My Not So Humble Opinion > > > > > > --David > > > > > > On Friday 22 February 2002 01:03 pm, you wrote: > > > > IMNSHO? What the hell is that? Man, the colloquial shortcuts are > > getting > > > > hairy these days.... :) > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:15 AM > > > > To: dIon Gillard; Struts Users Mailing List > > > > Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net > > > > > > > > > > > > "location independence" means independent of location, > > that is all. > > > > > > > > if you're implementing two interfaces to do (more or > > less) the exact > > same > > > > thing, and one is called "local" and one is called > > "remote" that is > > > > absolutely *not*, by any stretch of the imagination, "location > > > > independent". _end of story_. > > > > > > > > with EJBs the method call does not "appear" to be remote, > > because it > > is > > > > *explicitly* remote. the method is in a "RemoteInterface" and > > throws a > > > > "RemoteException" for crying out loud! > > > > > > > > furthermore, it's not about box1 vs box12. to be more > > precise, it's > > about > > > > vm1 vs. vm12. and, if you are writing a client, your client has > > business > > > > logic to take care of. it's the servers responsibility > > to determine > > > > whether it should call a method at vm1 or at vm12. > > > > > > > > IMNSHO, this is the achilles heel of EJB. > > > > > > > > --e-- > > > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 05:24:22 +1100, dIon Gillard wrote: > > > > >The method call can take place anywhere, but always appears to be > > > > >remote. That could be many remote machines though. Location > > independence > > > > >is not about local vs remote, it's more about box1 vs box12. > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
