> Are these diagrams correct?
I believe they would be correct if:
- On slide 1, you changed "Servlet" to "JSP"
- On slide 1, you called it simply "Model 1 / JSP" instead of MVC
1/Model 1.
(Model 1 and MVC are different. Model 1 implies NO MVC)
- On slide 2, you changed the label to "Model 2 / MVC".
- Eliminate all references to anything that says "MVC1" or "MVC2"
There is no such animal. It's "Model 1 / JSP" or "Model 2 / MVC".
Labeling should be one of:
- "Model 1 / JSP" and "Model 2 / MVC", or
- "Model 1" and "Model 2", or
- "JSP" and "MVC".
Lose the "MVC1" and "MVC2" labels. They don't apply.
IMO of course. Your mileage may vary depending on audience, etc.
Of course, you could always just model your two slides identically after
Figures 1 & 2 in the article I referenced in the last post. Then you'd even
have an authoritative source to reference. Plus you'd be sure they were
correct.
Best of luck,
FWIW -
Kevin
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
