I don't know much about Cocoon, but anytime you have to parse and transform,
it's going to take time.  XML -> XSLT -> HTML is done a lot in the ASP world
(I worked on such a project last summer) and the performance hit is very
noticeable.  XML is best suited for business-to-business communication
between disparate systems.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:07 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp


I also posted a "what do you think about cocoon" question a week or so
ago.....and still haven't gotten a response.

I'm still waiting.

JM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Struts Newsgroup [mailto:@[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 3:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: xml-xslt v jsp
>
>
> Subject: xml-xslt v jsp
> From: jisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  ===
> Just wondering what people's thoughts are on using XML pages that
> have XSLT
> applied to them to display html pages rather than using JSP's. I read an
> article recently that outlined this particular idea, apparently to even
> more separate the business logic from presentation, and
> supposedly increase
> development time. I would have a couple of questions about how
> performance
> would differ, just how much quicker development time would be and simply
> why this hasn't been implemented already, is there a flaw which
> has stopped
> such an implementation being used?
> Thanks for your thoughts.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to