Interesting digression, Brett is the editor for my Struts book. He's an awesome editor!
Chuck At 01:42 PM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote: >Brett Mclaughlin is the man. JDOM rules. > >my .02 > > >peace, >Joe > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:26 PM > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > > Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp > > > > > > And just for reference: > > > > Brett Mclaughlin, "Java and XML" (O'Reilly, 2001) > > Eric Burke, "Java and XSLT" (O'Reilly, 2001) > > Michael Kay, "XSLT, 2d ed." (Wrox, 2001)-considered the bible of XSLT > > > > Mark > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stout, Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:10 PM > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > > Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp > > > > > > There are a couple of issues (OK, I will only bring up a couple). > > > > 1) The development of the XSLT will be done by whom? Normally you want to > > separate the presentation from the development. XSLT is a very strong tool > > but can be considered almost a programming language. So you > > either teach web > > designer's XSLT, or you have a programmer convert the HTML into > > XSLT. Tools > > are on the way which should help solve this issue. > > 2) Performance. XSLT is interrupted, and is executed each time. It is my > > understanding that there is an initiative underway to create compiled XSLT > > (I believe they are called translets, but I've not kept in touch with that > > arena). > > > > Neither of these answer the "can you" question. They address the > > "should you > > today" question. I am not say don't do it. Just be aware. > > > > Kenneth. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Struts Newsgroup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:55 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: xml-xslt v jsp > > > > > > Subject: xml-xslt v jsp > > From: jisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > === > > Just wondering what people's thoughts are on using XML pages that > > have XSLT > > applied to them to display html pages rather than using JSP's. I read an > > article recently that outlined this particular idea, apparently to even > > more separate the business logic from presentation, and > > supposedly increase > > development time. I would have a couple of questions about how > > performance > > would differ, just how much quicker development time would be and simply > > why this hasn't been implemented already, is there a flaw which > > has stopped > > such an implementation being used? > > Thanks for your thoughts. > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
