Brett Mclaughlin is the man. JDOM rules. my .02
peace, Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:26 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp > > > And just for reference: > > Brett Mclaughlin, "Java and XML" (O'Reilly, 2001) > Eric Burke, "Java and XSLT" (O'Reilly, 2001) > Michael Kay, "XSLT, 2d ed." (Wrox, 2001)-considered the bible of XSLT > > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stout, Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:10 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp > > > There are a couple of issues (OK, I will only bring up a couple). > > 1) The development of the XSLT will be done by whom? Normally you want to > separate the presentation from the development. XSLT is a very strong tool > but can be considered almost a programming language. So you > either teach web > designer's XSLT, or you have a programmer convert the HTML into > XSLT. Tools > are on the way which should help solve this issue. > 2) Performance. XSLT is interrupted, and is executed each time. It is my > understanding that there is an initiative underway to create compiled XSLT > (I believe they are called translets, but I've not kept in touch with that > arena). > > Neither of these answer the "can you" question. They address the > "should you > today" question. I am not say don't do it. Just be aware. > > Kenneth. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Struts Newsgroup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: xml-xslt v jsp > > > Subject: xml-xslt v jsp > From: jisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > === > Just wondering what people's thoughts are on using XML pages that > have XSLT > applied to them to display html pages rather than using JSP's. I read an > article recently that outlined this particular idea, apparently to even > more separate the business logic from presentation, and > supposedly increase > development time. I would have a couple of questions about how > performance > would differ, just how much quicker development time would be and simply > why this hasn't been implemented already, is there a flaw which > has stopped > such an implementation being used? > Thanks for your thoughts. > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
