Yep, I have his O'Reilley text, most of which I've read--great tech writer.
I'm also adamant about the use of JDOM for all but the most
resource-intensive XML tasks, as I feel his API to be far superior to the
SAX or DOM standards.  I would actually NEVER use the DOM API instead of
JDOM;  I would only use SAX if speed/large data files were an issue.

Yeah, kudos to Jason too, I see his name all over my JDOM javadocs. :)


joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:05 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp
>
>
> He's a great guy - I've had many conversations with him and Jason on
> jdom-interest.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Cavaness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:00 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp
>
>
> Interesting digression, Brett is the editor for my Struts book. He's an
> awesome editor!
>
> Chuck
>
> At 01:42 PM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> >Brett Mclaughlin is the man.  JDOM rules.
> >
> >my .02
> >
> >
> >peace,
> >Joe
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:26 PM
> > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > > Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp
> > >
> > >
> > > And just for reference:
> > >
> > > Brett Mclaughlin, "Java and XML" (O'Reilly, 2001)
> > > Eric Burke, "Java and XSLT" (O'Reilly, 2001)
> > > Michael Kay, "XSLT, 2d ed." (Wrox, 2001)-considered the bible of XSLT
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stout, Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:10 PM
> > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> > > Subject: RE: xml-xslt v jsp
> > >
> > >
> > > There are a couple of issues (OK, I will only bring up a couple).
> > >
> > > 1) The development of the XSLT will be done by whom? Normally you want
> to
> > > separate the presentation from the development. XSLT is a very strong
> tool
> > > but can be considered almost a programming language. So you
> > > either teach web
> > > designer's XSLT, or you have a programmer convert the HTML into
> > > XSLT. Tools
> > > are on the way which should help solve this issue.
> > > 2) Performance. XSLT is interrupted, and is executed each
> time. It is my
> > > understanding that there is an initiative underway to create compiled
> XSLT
> > > (I believe they are called translets, but I've not kept in touch with
> that
> > > arena).
> > >
> > > Neither of these answer the "can you" question. They address the
> > > "should you
> > > today" question. I am not say don't do it. Just be aware.
> > >
> > > Kenneth.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Struts Newsgroup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:55 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: xml-xslt v jsp
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject: xml-xslt v jsp
> > > From: jisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >  ===
> > > Just wondering what people's thoughts are on using XML pages that
> > > have XSLT
> > > applied to them to display html pages rather than using
> JSP's. I read an
> > > article recently that outlined this particular idea,
> apparently to even
> > > more separate the business logic from presentation, and
> > > supposedly increase
> > > development time. I would have a couple of questions about how
> > > performance
> > > would differ, just how much quicker development time would be
> and simply
> > > why this hasn't been implemented already, is there a flaw which
> > > has stopped
> > > such an implementation being used?
> > > Thanks for your thoughts.
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to