> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:22 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [UTIL] Silly Question
>
>
> Mine is brainless - a direct rendition of Ted's example. I'm
> shocked it
> hasn't hit o.a.s.u yet, but I appreciate your commiting it :-)
OK, it's checked in. It'll show up in the 20020910 nightly build.
There are a few minor changes from the original:
* It implements Serializable, to be a good session citizen.
* It's not final, so you can extend it if necessary.
* It has a constructor.
* It has a meaningful toString() method.
Enjoy! :-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> Eddie
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:57 AM
> >>Subject: [UTIL] Silly Question
> >>
> >>
> >>I was browsing through Ted's past "Struts Tips" on
> husted.com and was
> >>reminded of the ImageButtonBean trick he suggested (Tip #1).
> >>I was then
> >>looking at his tip concerning use of a multi-box (Tip #7).
> >>The question
> >>came to mind: "Why is there an o.a.s.util.LabelValueBean and no
> >>o.a.s.util.ImageButtonBean?"
> >>
> >Because nobody has committed one yet. ;-) LVB was moved from
> struts-example
> >to the core when I had a need for it elsewhere. Scratching
> itches and all
> >that.
> >
> >>It just seems it would be
> >>really handy to
> >>have it there, rather than each of us having to code it. It's
> >>(obviously) a really "stupid" class, and wouldn't be
> volatile at all.
> >> Once committed, it could easily be forgotten and simply
> >>reused over and
> >>over and ... just like LabelValueBean. Would you like the
> >>copy I just
> >>wrote, or do you have something to commit?
> >>
> >Is your version different from the one on Ted's Tip #1 page?
> If so, let us
> >know how (or just post it - it can't be that big :).
> >
> >Otherwise, I can commit (a modified version of) Ted's class tonight.
> >
> >--
> >Martin Cooper
> >
> >> ... or is there
> >>some reason
> >>(that I am unaware of) that nobody has commited such a class?
> >>
> >>Curious,
> >>
> >>Eddie
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
