I'd add that even "Form" could be confusing to some. Based on the number of posts to this list, there appears to be a large percentage of new users who don't understand that both GET and POST requests can populate a form bean (and that you don't need a <form>...</form> to do it).
I'm not sure what a good alternative would be for ActionForm, however. RequestBean? RequestParametersBean? CrapIWantTheActionToUseBean? SasquatchBean*? ;-) I'll leave that decision up to those more creative with words than I. :D chris * <grins-at-James-Mitchell/> > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Stoessel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:46 AM > To: Struts Users > Subject: struts 2.0 naming conventions? > > > In the next version of struts, will there be some thought given > to the naming conventions of naming the main classes in struts? > Calling everything ActionThis and Actionthat is really confusing the > new user. > ActionForm could just be Form for example etc. > Thank You for your time. > > -- > Vincent Stoessel > Linux Systems Developer > vincent xaymaca.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
