I would suggest it be done, yes. You can make certain assumptions about a bean - having *Bean as a name immediately tells you certain things about a class. Though, for the dynamic classes, I suppose it's less appropriate ...
I'm cool with status quo :-) But, if change is about us - that's the way I personally would like to see it go. David Graham wrote: > To be devil's advocate...Why should you append the word "Bean" to your > class name? Should every class that's used as a bean have this word > appended to it? PersonBean, AccountBean, etc... > > I see nothing wrong with the current name of ActionForm but Form or > FormBean seem appropriate as well. In this case, adding Bean to the > end is appropriate because it's not meant to be used outside of a web > framework. > > Dave Peace :-) -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
