FormBean
Then, the name of the class goes well with what people call it. You
don't have a disconnect. If we're changing names, this is the
convention I would use for this.
(
.. and then you could do:
- DynaActionFormBean
- DynaValidatorFormBean
- ...
I know it kind of belabors the point, but it's probably easier
understood to use such nomenclature.
)
Bartley, Chris P [PCS] wrote:
>I'd add that even "Form" could be confusing to some. Based on the number of
>posts to this list, there appears to be a large percentage of new users who
>don't understand that both GET and POST requests can populate a form bean
>(and that you don't need a <form>...</form> to do it).
>
>I'm not sure what a good alternative would be for ActionForm, however.
>RequestBean? RequestParametersBean? CrapIWantTheActionToUseBean?
>SasquatchBean*? ;-) I'll leave that decision up to those more creative with
>words than I. :D
>
>chris
>* <grins-at-James-Mitchell/>
>
--
Eddie Bush
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
