Doesn't Struts already support JSP 1.2 packaged tag libraries? For 1.0.2, the following are contained in MEATA-INF/tlds:
struts-bean.tld struts-form.tld struts-html.tld struts-logic.tld struts-template.tld The taglib elements in those TLD files contain uri elements, so I simpy use something like this in my JSPs: <%@ taglib prefix="bean" uri="http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-bean-1.0.2"; %> and I don't have to worry about pulling the TLD files out of the JAR or adding taglib elements to web.xml. I'm pretty sure it's the same for 1.1b2, except for a change to the value of the uri element. Maybe I missed the intent of the question... Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:48:58 -0600 > > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: "Avoid Heavy Use of Logic Tags" ??? > > > > Would it hurt for struts to follow the 2.3 .jar layout? People using 2.3 > > could benefit from reduced deployment hassles while others could continue > > using the old way. > > > > Do you mean the "META-INF/tlds" directory? That depends on whether your > container gracefully deals with the same tag library getting declared more > than once (from the implicit search of the JAR, and the explicit > declaration in the web.xml file of most Struts apps). > > I cannot test this on every possible platform; therefore, making such a > change this late in the beta cycle seems like a high risk activity. It's > certainly something to do for post-1.1 though. > > > Dave > > Craig > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- Kris Schneider <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> D.O.Tech <http://www.dotech.com/> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
