> but I want to emphasize the fact that 1.0 based apps should > generally run fine in 1.1 unless you're doing some really intricate things. >
That's a good point. You'd hate to imply to 1.0.2 users that their stuff won't run on the next version. > For future versions of Struts, I'd likely support the x.y.z style that > Tomcat 4.1 (and Apache httpd server releases) use, where you do a > milestone with no "implied quality" label at all, and it's > then assigned an "alpha", "beta", or "general availability" label > after the fact, based on feedback. > I see a lot of value in this approach. It sort of avoids the whole issue that "beta" seems to mean something different with open source, or at least Apache products than it does with commercial stuff. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
