On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:45:56AM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > On 7 May 2015 at 09:28, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dirk and others, what do you think - should we make this new library > > dependency (Grantlee) optional like we do with Marble? > > Should the printing be completely disabled if the user decides to > > build with NO_GRANTLEE or should we fall back to the current Qt-only > > based printing (creates bloat as we are going to have 2 printing > > modules)? > > > > also GSoC wise, do you think the new printing code should enter master > > while WIP or should it do so all at once when mostly done? > > > > bump for two important questions.
Sorry Yes, make it optional, please, and no, don't have two different print subsystems I would like the code to be treated like all our contributions to the core of Subsurface - I prefer to get code early and often. I prefer for the mentors to sign off on the code by the students, though. That way I can see when you consider it ready to go into master. Thanks /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
