On 12 May 2015 at 11:24, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:45:56AM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> On 7 May 2015 at 09:28, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Dirk and others, what do you think - should we make this new library >> > dependency (Grantlee) optional like we do with Marble? >> > Should the printing be completely disabled if the user decides to >> > build with NO_GRANTLEE or should we fall back to the current Qt-only >> > based printing (creates bloat as we are going to have 2 printing >> > modules)? >> > >> > also GSoC wise, do you think the new printing code should enter master >> > while WIP or should it do so all at once when mostly done? >> > >> >> bump for two important questions. > > Sorry > > Yes, make it optional, please, and no, don't have two different print > subsystems > > I would like the code to be treated like all our contributions to the core > of Subsurface - I prefer to get code early and often. > > I prefer for the mentors to sign off on the code by the students, though. > That way I can see when you consider it ready to go into master. >
thanks! lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
