On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:20:22PM +0200, Joakim Bygdell wrote: > > Didn't manage to quote the patch for some reason... anyway, any chance we > > could have the disclaimer message once and use a parameter to insert the > > algorithm? That way the translators only need to do it once as well. > > > > It's a small nit pick, I know. > > Obviously that is the way to do it.. to much blood in my coffee system I > presume.
A serious condition I frequently suffer from as well... > >> 0002, rearranged the GUI to make it visibly easier to see which settings > >> that belong together. > >> 0003, disables GF fields when VPM-B is the selected deco model. > > > > Those both seem like great additions. Thank you. What I'm wondering is if > > you could "indent" the sub items a little - basically add some left margin > > to them so that it still is obvious that the three modes (recreational, > > Buhlmann, VPM) are radio buttons and the others are sub options… > > Will do. Thank you. > > Silly question, what was the forth patch in the series (since they are > > numbered x/4)? :-) > > The fourth was an idea to spell Bühlmann correctly, Ha. I got flamed big time when I (as a German) opted for the Americanized spelling. Back then a could of Google search results showed a lot more for Buhlmann. Not sure if that's still the case. And since we now use UTF-8 all over the place, maybe it's time to revisit this decision. But if you do that, please do it everywhere (documentation, etc). > on the other hand it might be better to use the technical therm ZHL-16B > as it shows which implementation we use. ZHL-16B certainly rolls off the tongue, doesn't it? I'm not sure what people are going to be more familiar with. I would lean towards Bühlmann and put the exact algorithm in there once (but not as the name of the radio button that switches algorithms). Thanks /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
