> On 07 Jul 2015, at 23:46, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>  
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> > > Silly question, what was the forth patch in the series (since they are
> > > numbered x/4)? :-)
> >
> > The fourth was an idea to spell Bühlmann correctly,
> 
> Ha. I got flamed big time when I (as a German) opted for the Americanized
> spelling. Back then a could of Google search results showed a lot more for
> Buhlmann. Not sure if that's still the case. And since we now use UTF-8
> all over the place, maybe it's time to revisit this decision.
> 
> But if you do that, please do it everywhere (documentation, etc).
> 
> Just prying open the can of worms...  The default Subsurface language is US 
> English (much as I'd rather UK or AU English, I'm not going to win that 
> battle), and I'm pretty sure the accepted American spelling would be 
> Buhlmann.  I'm also happy with Bühlmann, being the correct spelling of the 
> man's name, and an anglophone without knowledge of Germanic languages would 
> almost certainly read ü as u.  So Bühlmann keeps the purists happy, while not 
> confusing the non-German speakers.
> 
> But I don't really like Buehlmann.  I understand that ue is a 'translation' 
> for ü, but in the literature I have read on decompression theory, the name 
> has been spelt Bühlmann or Buhlmann.  Quoting from Google, two minutes ago 
> when searching for 'Buehlmann decompression':
> Did you mean: Buhlmann decompression 
> <https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Buhlmann+decompression&spell=1&sa=X&ei=FEacVbWiL8jM8gWC85zICg&ved=0CBoQBSgA>Buhlmann
>  might be the closest we get, but at least it should not be spelled 
> “Buehlmann”.
It seems that Jan is the one to blame for that strange way of spelling in the 
code.

> 
> 
> 
> > on the other hand it might be better to use the technical therm ZHL-16B
> > as it shows which implementation we use.
> 
> ZHL-16B certainly rolls off the tongue, doesn't it? I'm not sure what
> people are going to be more familiar with. I would lean towards Bühlmann
> and put the exact algorithm in there once (but not as the name of the
> radio button that switches algorithms).
> 
> We can put the full algorithm name in the notes and the tooltip, but I 
> wouldn't want to take up any more space in the configuration options.

It is added to the planner notes now.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rick
> 

/Jocke

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to