On 26 August 2015 at 00:33, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > Add more VPM-B planner tests. The "expected" total run time is taken as > the > total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program. For all these > tests, the > results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are > classified > as a "fail". > > It would be helpful if we could consider a result close to our benchmark as a pass, and show the difference. But I don't know how to do that. For example, we could consider +/- (1% + 1 minute) a pass.
I also tried to produce a test for repetitive dives, but got stuck on making a test plan without clearing tissues. The attached results are after applying the couple of VPM-B patches I sent "for discussion" this morning my time. R
testplan-results
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
