On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 26 August 2015 at 00:33, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Add more VPM-B planner tests. The "expected" total run time is taken as >> the >> total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program. For all these >> tests, the >> results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are >> classified >> as a "fail". >> > > It would be helpful if we could consider a result close to our benchmark as > a pass, and show the difference. But I don't know how to do that. For > example, we could consider +/- (1% + 1 minute) a pass.
Would this help? http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtest.html#QVERIFY miika _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
