On 26 Aug 2015 12:47 am, "Miika Turkia" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 26 August 2015 at 00:33, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Add more VPM-B planner tests. The "expected" total run time is taken as > >> the > >> total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program. For all these > >> tests, the > >> results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are > >> classified > >> as a "fail". > >> > > > > It would be helpful if we could consider a result close to our benchmark as > > a pass, and show the difference. But I don't know how to do that. For > > example, we could consider +/- (1% + 1 minute) a pass. > > Would this help? > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtest.html#QVERIFY >
Yes, I think it would. But not tonight. Thanks, Rick
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
