On 29 May 2016 07:37, "Dirk Hohndel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have been focused on other things for a while (and the why and the what
will become public fairly soon) and decided to use that chance to figure
out what would happen if I just stopped paying attention here for a while.
>
> Here's what I think I learned (correct me if I'm wrong)
>
> a) no one cares about Subsurface-mobile. No bug reports, no code, no
suggestions, nothing. So I guess we should call this a failed attempt and
abandon it - screw the 500 or so people who use it.
>
I have no idea of numbers, but I care about it and it's a great tool. I
think it's at the point where the questions is whether the effort of adding
new features is worth the reward... if someone is pushing to add something
new and doing the work then great. But right now it looks like that isn't
happening, which is fine - we have a great tool now. It's not bug-free, so
that should be where any effort on Subsurface-mobile should be directed.

> b) Miika continues to deal with any import bug that shows up. Awesome.
Your patches have been pushed
>
Awesome.

> c) there continues to be a slow crawl of features, ideas, patches for the
planner. Those have also been pushed (someone poke me if I got something
wrong there)
>
All my little recent patches have been pushed. There should be another one
or two coming, but I make no promises on timing.  I've a few things going
on here too.

> d) no one cares about the dive site mess that we have. The current
version in Subsurface 4.5.x is pretty much unusable and makes no bleeping
sense.  No patches, some suggestions for improvement, no discussion,
nothing.
>
Unusable? Yes, it's not ideal yet but Iuse it. And it sounds like others do
too.

>
> In summary, this project is pretty much dead. I guess it does everything
the formerly active developers wanted? Or everyone has moved on to more fun
things? Or had children, changed jobs, built a house, lost their job, or
one of a number of other life events?
>
>
> So what should we be working on...? Should we...
>
> (1) just shut this down and move on?

There are many significant contributers but you've been the driving force
behind the project since I've been using it (well before I submitted any
patches). It's not for me to say what you should work on, but I really
don't want to see the project wound up.

> (2) move things to maintenance mode, abandon Subsurface-mobile, fix bugs
in Subsurface whenever we find time but otherwise declare victory? It won't
be too painful to track libdicecomputer and keep making 4.5.x releases for
a while, I guess...

That's very fair for the time being. If people are working hard to add
features, then great. But I'm happy with what we have now. Slow progress
and cleaning bugs up when they stick out are good objectives.

> (3) focus on Subsurface-mobile, release the iOS version, update the
Android version and see if there is a single person besides me who is
willing to invest time into that?

I appreciate the subsurface-mobile, and an ios version would open up a new
user base, but I won't promise to spend hours and hours on it any time
soon. For one thing, my skills are lacking. So is time.

> (4) focus on Subsurface 4.6, fix the dive site management and create a
list of prioritized features that we want to get in place?

That'd be great. But it needn't happen overnight. Probably the first goal
would be to work out how it should work (easier said than done). Then
implement it.

> (5) focus on Subsurface 5.0, write a completely new UI and abandon what
we have in 4.5?

I think we can't see that happening in a hurry.

>
> If your vote is for 3, 4, or 5 I assume that you are volunteering to
carry some of the work that is needed to get there.
> If you don't vote, I will count that as a vote for 1.
>
My "vote" is to work with 2, and aim for 4. Anything else needs someone to
drive it hard. You've put in so much work for 3. It seems close, but I know
nothing about ios development.
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to